About me  Quadrents!   ASK THE GREAT LORD OZ A QUESTION!   Submit stuff!
Reblogged from 1ns1de-0ut-w0rld
raptorjesusbearcavalry:

thisgirllovesherfandoms:

tired-and-fed-up:

IM FREAKING OUT AND NO ONE UNDERSTANDS HHHH

AND THE CUSHIONS FIT WHAT KIND OF QUADRANTS THEY’RE IN TOO AAHHH

Sometimes I feel like tumblr users have never seen a deck of fucking cards before.

raptorjesusbearcavalry:

thisgirllovesherfandoms:

tired-and-fed-up:

IM FREAKING OUT AND NO ONE UNDERSTANDS HHHH

AND THE CUSHIONS FIT WHAT KIND OF QUADRANTS THEY’RE IN TOO AAHHH

Sometimes I feel like tumblr users have never seen a deck of fucking cards before.

(Source: 1ns1de-0ut-w0rld, via femnoiz)

Reblogged from burgrs

burgrs:

"as a straight male, i ppbppbpttt hhptpphhptpp hpbptpphptppthpbbphbh"

(via murdockniccals)

Reblogged from originpallettown

queencersei:

originpallettown:

So you can’t like Cersei Lannister as a character because she’s an evil bitch, but it’s okay to love Loki and Walter White?

(via daryldiixon)

Reblogged from neil-gaiman

the-old-folk-blues said: Why is it that the ethnicity of your characters is so important to visual adaptions when you rarely, if ever, mention it in your prose?

neil-gaiman:

muchymozzarella:

neil-gaiman:

I don’t really understand the question. If the ethnicity of the characters wasn’t in the prose it wouldn’t be mentioned at all in the adaptations and nobody would care. If you are paying attention you will find all sorts of people in the books, with all sorts of backgrounds. 

And it probably came from comics, in which I could have someone drawn as being part of a particular race or ethnicity and then not have to have them talk about being part of that ethnicity, but simply get on with the business of being in the story and behaving as that person, with that point of view, which would include ethnicity, would behave.

It’s important because representation

And also because I was stupid enough to think Fat Charlie was white for the entirety of Anansi Boys until in hindsight I realized what having Anansi for a dad would obviously mean 

Neil may not always say explicitly what the characters’ ethnicities are but he implies them enough, and if you’re paying attention, you’ll be able to figure it out. 

And maybe this is difficult to understand but as someone who’s grown up a bibliophile, who was so bombarded by white characters that I default to Caucasian in my head even when the character is decidedly nonwhite, it’s important to shake off those years of idiotic Western/Caucasian-centricity by portraying characters as other ethnicities.

Exactly.

Reblogged from robert-winchester-novak
I am a feminist. I’ve been female for a long time now. I’d be stupid not to be on my own side. Maya Angelou (via perfect)

(Source: robert-winchester-novak, via daryldiixon)

Reblogged from huffpostarts

underhuntressmoon:

theprettiestboy:

essayofthoughts:

indigoumbrella:

essayofthoughts:

indigoumbrella:

huffpostarts:

In The Not So Distant Future, Glow-In-The-Dark Trees Could Replace Street Lights

Is that… is that even healthy?

There are sea organisms and fungi which glow in the dark and there’s fireflies and jellyfish which glow in the dark. It doesn’t do them any harm nor does it do the people around them any harm. I would say its pretty healthy, as well as it would mean more photosynthesis happening in cities which mean cleaner air.

I was just curious about how they were doing it and for some reason I didn’t think to click the link. But thanks! It makes more sense now. I was afraid it was some kind of chemical thing.

nah just genetic modification using existing bioluminescent genes. Genetics is really cool, and so is bioluminescence. I mean they’ve already made pigs glow using jellyfish genes and pigs are waaay more complicated than trees iirc. So they’re actually (i think) less likely to muck it up with trees.

In which case

GLOWY

FORESTS

GLOWY

TREES

GLOWY

EVERYTHING

(I like glowy things)

You can already buy packets of seeds for little bio-luminescent plants. They’re like $40 a pack so I haven’t been able to afford them yet, but this is happening right now. 

We’re moving towards Underdark aesthetic and I love it

(via ramblingbludragon)

Reblogged from shauneezy

shauneezy:

So if you’re not up to date, twitter has a new trending topic #iftheygunnedmedown and black men and women are showing the medias portrayal of blacks. Here a few things I would like to point out
1.) white people, sorry, this hashtag is not for you. Black men are being murdered and this is not a time to make a mockery out of this.

Quick story: in my sociology class I took this spring, we were taking about racial profiling and our professor was Indian and she was talking about her experiences and what not.

This black boy in class raised his hand to say “I always get pulled over, I even got pulled over while I was walking!” The class was laughing and stuff.

Then this white boy raised his hand and said, “well, I got pulled over and they searched me one night”

The professor is like “what did you do?”

He’s like “I was speeding and ran a red light”

😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑😑✋

Bruh stop it. This is what I’m talking about white people trying to equate their stupidity with actual oppression.

Bye Felicia.

Leave comments below. I want to hear your thoughts 🙇

(via actualmenacebuckybarnes)

Reblogged from hugscream

hugscream:

Guardians of the Galaxy: Minimalist Posters

So… I went to see GotG yesterday and it was great. For a Marvel film I really loved everything about it, and I could write paragraphs on everything I loved however, here are some posters I made to represent each ‘guardian’ (Star-Lord, Gamora, Drax, Groot and Rocket respectively). I hope you enjoy them, I might do some more characters in the future! And go and see the film if you haven’t already!! 

(Disclaimer: I tried to draw Gamora’s sword and it was so bad so she got the orb.. sorry Gamora)

(via edwardspoonhands)

Reblogged from dangerhamster

dangerhamster:

SCREEN JUNKIES DID AN HONEST TRAILER FOR THE WINTER SOLDIER BUT IT WAS SO GOOD THEY COULDN’T EVEN TAKE THE PISS OUT OF IT SO THEY JUST TALKED ABOUT WHAT A GOOD FILM IT WAS

(via macko-mori)

Reblogged from thehpalliance
thehpalliance:

If you use YouTube, you need to know this.
You’ve heard all these rumblings about Net Neutrality over the past several months. Let’s get real: this is about controlling online video. It is estimated that by 2017, video content will account for 80-90% of all global Internet traffic.
This isn’t just about not being able to binge-watch a series on Netflix. It’s about the future of online video as we know it.
Whether your YouTube channel is home to daily vlogs, short films, or just that one video from when the cinnamon challenge seemed like a good idea, you’re a video creator. Your content and comments help shape this community. Let’s keep it that way.
Net Neutrality means that your YouTube videos reach people at the same speed as clips from last night’s episode of the Tonight Show. It means a level playing field for video creators looking to reach an audience. But new Net Neutrality rules could mess that up.
Here’s the deal: Telecommunications companies already charge us to access the Internet through our homes and our phones. New FCC rules could allow them to also charge content providers (like YouTube, Netflix, and even PBS) for access to our eyeballs. It could create a fast lane for Jimmy Fallon’s clips, and slow lane for your YouTube videos.
It is really important that the FCC understands that online video creators care about Net Neutrality. Even if you’ve only ever uploaded ONE VIDEO, you are a creator and you have a voice.
If you can, please add your channel to our petition. We’ll deliver this to the FCC in September and demonstrate that the online video community cares about this issue. 
Sign the petition, then spread the word.

thehpalliance:

If you use YouTube, you need to know this.

You’ve heard all these rumblings about Net Neutrality over the past several months. Let’s get real: this is about controlling online video. It is estimated that by 2017, video content will account for 80-90% of all global Internet traffic.

This isn’t just about not being able to binge-watch a series on Netflix. It’s about the future of online video as we know it.

Whether your YouTube channel is home to daily vlogs, short films, or just that one video from when the cinnamon challenge seemed like a good idea, you’re a video creator. Your content and comments help shape this community. Let’s keep it that way.

Net Neutrality means that your YouTube videos reach people at the same speed as clips from last night’s episode of the Tonight Show. It means a level playing field for video creators looking to reach an audience. But new Net Neutrality rules could mess that up.

Here’s the deal: Telecommunications companies already charge us to access the Internet through our homes and our phones. New FCC rules could allow them to also charge content providers (like YouTube, Netflix, and even PBS) for access to our eyeballs. It could create a fast lane for Jimmy Fallon’s clips, and slow lane for your YouTube videos.

It is really important that the FCC understands that online video creators care about Net Neutrality. Even if you’ve only ever uploaded ONE VIDEO, you are a creator and you have a voice.

If you can, please add your channel to our petition. We’ll deliver this to the FCC in September and demonstrate that the online video community cares about this issue.

Sign the petition, then spread the word.

(via edwardspoonhands)